NRL inflating attendance figures

bazza · Post by **bazza** » Fri Jul 24, 2009 10:23 pm

Nines wrote:
IanRitchie wrote:
nobleoz wrote:Inflating 4,401 to 5,102........what a joke!
yes, that extra seven hundred people really improved the crowd average
Yes trhat's only 25%

701 is closer to 16% of 4401, but lets not worry about technicalities

Nines · Post by **Nines** » Sat Jul 25, 2009 1:03 pm

bazza wrote:
Nines wrote:
IanRitchie wrote: yes, that extra seven hundred people really improved the crowd average
Yes trhat's only 25%
701 is closer to 16% of 4401, but lets not worry about technicalities

I'm not .The usual practice is to round to the nearest thousand .
I agree , when you only get 4401 at best(I bet it was only 4399)
hundreds make for a big swing .
.

gyfox · Post by **gyfox** » Sat Jul 25, 2009 1:33 pm

Nines wrote:
bazza wrote:
Nines wrote: Yes trhat's only 25%
701 is closer to 16% of 4401, but lets not worry about technicalities
I'm not .The usual practice is to round to the nearest thousand .
I agree , when you only get 4401 at best(I bet it was only 4399)
hundreds make for a big swing .
.

I just checked my temperature and pulse because I had written a response saying that its normal to round to the nearest thousand but had decided not to post it. Now when I look at this thread some hours later I find I am in agreement with Nines. I am alive and I am well. I suppose 2 disparate minds have to coincide sometime.

IanRitchie · Post by **IanRitchie** » Sat Jul 25, 2009 5:27 pm

Nines wrote:
IanRitchie wrote:
nobleoz wrote:Inflating 4,401 to 5,102........what a joke!
yes, that extra seven hundred people really improved the crowd average
Yes trhat's only 25%

seriously, what position do you hold at the afl? head mong of the internet department?

deejaybee · Post by **deejaybee** » Sat Jul 25, 2009 5:54 pm

his office is next to the photocopier.
Or, considering how americanised our so-called "homogenous" game is becoming, should that be the Xerox?

Jeffles · Post by **Jeffles** » Sun Jul 26, 2009 8:52 am

It's good of RLW to make these investigations. The NRL itself is not the organisation doing this. It comes down to the venue or the club.

Nines · Post by **Nines** » Sun Jul 26, 2009 11:30 am

IanRitchie wrote:
Nines wrote:
IanRitchie wrote: yes, that extra seven hundred people really improved the crowd average
Yes trhat's only 25%
seriously, what position do you hold at the afl?

Seriously , you can't handle one guy who likes a debate ? And
seriously , if I worked for the AFL I'd be a nice guy like Nobleoz,
or a measured guy like Rob ........... .

.

nobleoz · Post by **nobleoz** » Sun Jul 26, 2009 2:57 pm

Nines...I usually find I agree with you. But I certainly agree with your very perceptive comment about me