Texas 41 d USC 38 in fron tof 95,000
Rose Bowl 2006
- Dan
- Silver
- Posts: 836
- Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2002 10:15 pm
- Location: Yarra Valley,Melbourne
- britishspud
- Silver
- Posts: 888
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 6:11 am
- Location: THE MIGHTY OLDHAM
- IanRitchie
- Platinum
- Posts: 3231
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2003 4:18 pm
- Location: auckland
- Egan
- Platinum
- Posts: 14959
- Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2002 1:14 am
- Location: Perth
- Contact:
- HoldenV8
- Silver
- Posts: 886
- Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 1:19 pm
- Location: Adelaide
Its amazing how often you can read the skyscrapercity forums and see how much the Europeans bag American stadiums, be it for the retractable roofs, domes or bowls like the Rose Bowl. Often becuase they aren't their precious soccer stadiums.
Personally, I love the look of the Rose Bowl. A traditional form of stadium in a modern society.
Personally, I love the look of the Rose Bowl. A traditional form of stadium in a modern society.
- IanRitchie
- Platinum
- Posts: 3231
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2003 4:18 pm
- Location: auckland
- Egan
- Platinum
- Posts: 14959
- Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2002 1:14 am
- Location: Perth
- Contact:
On the whole I am not a huge fan of American Stadiums, but the Rose Bowl is an exception...HoldenV8 wrote:Its amazing how often you can read the skyscrapercity forums and see how much the Europeans bag American stadiums, be it for the retractable roofs, domes or bowls like the Rose Bowl. Often becuase they aren't their precious soccer stadiums.
Personally, I love the look of the Rose Bowl. A traditional form of stadium in a modern society.
- britishspud
- Silver
- Posts: 888
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 6:11 am
- Location: THE MIGHTY OLDHAM
it think it's cos theres no real "design" to big bowl stadia..but i like them cos they have a sense of colosseum about themHoldenV8 wrote:Its amazing how often you can read the skyscrapercity forums and see how much the Europeans bag American stadiums, be it for the retractable roofs, domes or bowls like the Rose Bowl. Often becuase they aren't their precious soccer stadiums.
Personally, I love the look of the Rose Bowl. A traditional form of stadium in a modern society.
- Egan
- Platinum
- Posts: 14959
- Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2002 1:14 am
- Location: Perth
- Contact:
For me the Rose Bowl is unique in that it is circular but plays host to a rectangular based sport...a remarkable architectural feat for when it was probably constructed...and the stadium is instantly recognisable throughout the world.britishspud wrote:it think it's cos theres no real "design" to big bowl stadia..but i like them cos they have a sense of colosseum about themHoldenV8 wrote:Its amazing how often you can read the skyscrapercity forums and see how much the Europeans bag American stadiums, be it for the retractable roofs, domes or bowls like the Rose Bowl. Often becuase they aren't their precious soccer stadiums.
Personally, I love the look of the Rose Bowl. A traditional form of stadium in a modern society.
A classic case of why you need not have the most fanciest design...but a stadium that is recognisable, has bucketloads of history attached to it, and a design that is unique to that stadium and that stadium only...
I think the Best Stadiums in the world have all of the above criteria...and Rose Bowl is definately one of those
-
- Bronze
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 10:37 pm
the colosseum goes up more then it goes out across.
I acknowledge the spectacle of being able to fill a stadium like that where a large percentage of the seats wont be able to see the ball, but i dont rate the stadium design at all.
To me it just looks like the result of post war era economics of jamming as many people in for as little money as possible a couple of times a year, if that, and having it empty for the rest of the year. It is as if somebody let off a hydrogen bomb and then put seating on the crater walls.
The lack of roof and incline probably does nothing for the accoustics. Not that it matters alot with crowds of that size.
I acknowledge the spectacle of being able to fill a stadium like that where a large percentage of the seats wont be able to see the ball, but i dont rate the stadium design at all.
To me it just looks like the result of post war era economics of jamming as many people in for as little money as possible a couple of times a year, if that, and having it empty for the rest of the year. It is as if somebody let off a hydrogen bomb and then put seating on the crater walls.
The lack of roof and incline probably does nothing for the accoustics. Not that it matters alot with crowds of that size.