2012 Decision - LONDON WINS
- Cheesie-the-Pirate
- Gold
- Posts: 2411
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2003 10:26 am
- Location: Cheering for the Pirate King!
2012 Decision - LONDON WINS
Due on Wednesday Eve at 9:30 I believe.
I'm still rooting for London.
Anywhere but Paris!
I'm still rooting for London.
Anywhere but Paris!
Last edited by Cheesie-the-Pirate on Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Egan
- Platinum
- Posts: 14959
- Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2002 1:14 am
- Location: Perth
- Contact:
- britishspud
- Silver
- Posts: 888
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 6:11 am
- Location: THE MIGHTY OLDHAM
- Jeffles
- Platinum
- Posts: 9499
- Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2002 8:44 pm
- Location: The Jet Set Lounge - Henson Park
They are. When I was in London 2 years ago the tour guide crapped on about city regeneration (built around commercial expansion) and East End regeneration (built around the Games - includingt he main stadium).Simmo79 wrote:I thought they'd ruled wembley out for the Olympics and are looking at a new stadium in the East End. I'd like to hear 'Spud's opinion now
He also said the London authorities were increasingly using the term East Side instead of East End (because of the poor connotations from the latter). He was a West Ham fan and not happy at all. "How can they stop such an established name? I stand around with 35,000 other football fans every second week jumping up and down chanting Eastenders Eastenders"
- britishspud
- Silver
- Posts: 888
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 6:11 am
- Location: THE MIGHTY OLDHAM
this is the olympic stadium during the games capacity 80,000

god know what it's going to cost,i reckon around £500million.then after the games it's going to be reconfigured into a 25,000 capacity.nodoubt the most expensive small stadium ever built

my problem is this.. with a capacity of 25k it's not large enough to hold the world championships...maybe big enough to hold a european champs.. on an anual basis the only time this stadium is going to be filled is for the london grand prix, for which you WOULD sell 65/70k tickets easily....which would provide a vast amount of income for the athletics assoiciation.....
an 80,000 capacity stadium might temp a EPL team to relocate,a 25k one won't...
the playing area of an athletics stadium is large enough to play cricket on,
stick a drop in wicket in the middle,turf over the track, england v oz,one day cricket and 80,000 fans.....
they are missing the commercial value of a large stadium imo

god know what it's going to cost,i reckon around £500million.then after the games it's going to be reconfigured into a 25,000 capacity.nodoubt the most expensive small stadium ever built

my problem is this.. with a capacity of 25k it's not large enough to hold the world championships...maybe big enough to hold a european champs.. on an anual basis the only time this stadium is going to be filled is for the london grand prix, for which you WOULD sell 65/70k tickets easily....which would provide a vast amount of income for the athletics assoiciation.....
an 80,000 capacity stadium might temp a EPL team to relocate,a 25k one won't...
the playing area of an athletics stadium is large enough to play cricket on,
stick a drop in wicket in the middle,turf over the track, england v oz,one day cricket and 80,000 fans.....

they are missing the commercial value of a large stadium imo
- greeny
- Bronze
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 1:46 pm
wat really pisses me of is that the thorpedeo (that prick) has got his tounge up the arse of some yank really licking brown and prob getting paid alot of money for it saying he is backing new york cos he says its like another home to him, well if thats how u feel prick then f**k off and dont come back i wont miss u!
very unAustralian
on a nicer note go paris!!!

very unAustralian
on a nicer note go paris!!!



- Cheesie-the-Pirate
- Gold
- Posts: 2411
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2003 10:26 am
- Location: Cheering for the Pirate King!
-
- Bronze
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 7:04 pm
- Location: Brisbane, Australia
- Egan
- Platinum
- Posts: 14959
- Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2002 1:14 am
- Location: Perth
- Contact:
- Joey
- Silver
- Posts: 1002
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 7:29 pm
- Location: Manly
The French owe England for their country still being around today.
Well, the English have 7 years to pick up their act. I suppose the Greeks did in the end.
I guess I just wish it would go to a city/nation that has never had the Olympics. The closest was probably Madrid. Even a South African city as they are hosting a competition extremely competitive for the "Largest sporting event" tag in 2010. Am I right to say Africa has never hosted a games?
I would have gone for New York if Atlanta never received the games.
Well, the English have 7 years to pick up their act. I suppose the Greeks did in the end.
I guess I just wish it would go to a city/nation that has never had the Olympics. The closest was probably Madrid. Even a South African city as they are hosting a competition extremely competitive for the "Largest sporting event" tag in 2010. Am I right to say Africa has never hosted a games?
I would have gone for New York if Atlanta never received the games.