Page 29 of 30

Re: AFL 2012

Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 9:27 pm
by RobertHeatleyStand
nobleoz wrote:So AFL will now get crowds of 19,000 & the excuse will be that there are other things to do because the weather is so nice ;-)
watching television on a sunny day... those tv ratings :popcorn:

Re: AFL 2012

Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 7:39 am
by nobleoz
North Melb announce a $1 mill profit. Hobart has paid off

Re: AFL 2012

Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 8:22 pm
by yob
So the AFL draft wraps up on the gold coast. What a terrible choice of a venue. Just terrible accoustics. All you could hear was Greater Western Sydney Greater Western Sydney Greater Western Sydney Greater Western Sydney Greater Western Sydney Greater Western Sydney

Re: AFL 2012

Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 6:13 am
by nobleoz
In outer space no-one can hear you say GWS

Re: AFL 2012

Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 9:13 am
by yob
nobleoz wrote:In outer space no-one can hear you say GWS
Nobody can hear you say it in Western Sydney either...

Re: AFL 2012

Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 10:18 am
by Boba Fett
The Draft was on?

Re: AFL 2012

Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 11:55 am
by gyfox
Boba Fett wrote:The Draft was on?
Yup... someone left the door open.

Re: AFL 2012

Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 12:31 pm
by nobleoz
A good article by Wilson. Last 3 paras particularly.

http://www.smh.com.au/afl/afl-news/afl- ... 29yyp.html

Re: AFL 2012

Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 3:21 pm
by Rob
No, it's a sh*t article. People need to realise that they are football clubs, not welfare organisations, nor babysitters. Their primary objective is to win football games, and they are well within their rights to cut people loose that detract from that objective. That's how the real world works. We're talking about grown men here.

That doesn't mean that clubs have no role in looking after the welfare of their players, as doing so can assist in winning football games by getting players' heads in check. Stable, happy players are more likely to perform better on the field. Likewise, it's not sensible for clubs to turn a blind eye to off field misdemeanours, as it can blow out and destroy the culture of the club, which in turn loses you games. But if a player goes off the rails because he chooses to be a dickhead, then the responsibility lies with that player. Clubs need to then make an informed decision whether to get rid of him or try and fix him up.

It might be in the interests of the AFL to assist in a lot of these cases, but it's not a club's responsibility IMO.

Re: AFL 2012

Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 4:43 pm
by yob
Rob wrote:No, it's a sh*t article.
Correctamundo.

There's not too many occupations out there that pay you 200k to be a complete bogan. If you're not one to appreciate that privelege then step aside for the next person in line.

4 players named in the U18 Australian team were not drafted this year. Moneyball springs to mind here. I bet there's 4 draftees that will cry foul when the "system" let's them down with their alcohol problem. Step aside for these young talents who missed out and would quite eagerly prove the recruiters wrong.

Re: AFL 2012

Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 9:47 am
by kilonewton
yob wrote: There's not too many occupations out there that pay you 200k to be a complete bogan.
Therein lies the problem. Even now, in the age of "full time professionalism", these blokes have too much time on their hands. When a bloke I used to know was on Carlton's Supp List (late 90s), every Carlton player had to either have paid work or be studying to keep them out of trouble.
I'd love to get 200k to work part time.

Re: AFL 2012

Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 1:42 pm
by Rob
It's not really a part time job, but it can be weird hours. You might have a 6am-10am training session, and have to come back from 3pm-7pm for another one. That would include a lot of tactical stuff like video analysis and the gameplan. But you're right in that you would have a lot of free time. A lot of clubs force players to do some part time study to make sure they're kept occupied.

Not that I wouldn't love to have that sort of life if given the chance. Average salary of close to $300k now. Not that i'm under any misconception that it would be easy.

Re: AFL 2012

Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 2:20 pm
by nobleoz
I would want more than $300k to be in the public eye whenever I went out!

Re: AFL 2012

Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 3:13 pm
by yob
nobleoz wrote:I would want more than $300k to be in the public eye whenever I went out!
And someone else wouldn't. That 4 All Australians didn't get drafted this year would suggest the talent pool is deep. Let the immature narcissists price themselves out of the market.

Re: AFL 2012

Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 4:54 am
by nobleoz
The best players are the ones who say they're doing something they really love - & getting paid for it