Page 1 of 2

Tottenham Hotspur outline scheme

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 7:40 am
by james_

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:35 am
by Simmo79
have a gander at the 2nd doc - many parallels to the proposed Subi re-dev

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 9:14 am
by Jeffles
Simmo79 wrote:have a gander at the 2nd doc - many parallels to the proposed Subi re-dev
Absolutely. 60,000 seats? That's a lotta four by twos eh Bozza? Just kidding. Pretty big but if Spurs ever got back into gear they'd test it.

And good on them for increasing public transport se when visiting WHL.

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:45 pm
by beastjim
With 70,000 Club members and 22,000 people on the waiting list for a season ticket
I presume that is the motive. At first I was thinking this is crazy, your oldest stand is only 20 years old and look how constrained your site is. Then you see plans and it really is a grand plan, the local council would have to work with them to ensure they can buy all the properties they need.

If the plan could be executed by 2018 it could be London's second stadium for the world cup. It would be a close contest between it and Arsenal's Emirates stadium.

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 2:23 pm
by Kelly_7
Simmo79 wrote:have a gander at the 2nd doc - many parallels to the proposed Subi re-dev
One difference would be this one will probably get built :lol: But its a much needed upgrade in capacity, because as bj said they have alot of people that simple just can't get into their games.

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 2:53 pm
by Egan
Difference is this is being funded by a private organisation.

Not a Government organisation.

Agreed there public transport to the ground is impressive.

Oh and good to see James posting again 8)

Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 5:09 pm
by Simmo79
The local council has refused Tottenham Hotspur permission to build a new ground on Northumberland Park . A council official says, ‘A fun fair once a year is one thing but a permanent circus is out of the question’.

Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 10:42 am
by Jeffles
Simmo79 wrote:The local council has refused Tottenham Hotspur permission to build a new ground on Northumberland Park . A council official says, ‘A fun fair once a year is one thing but a permanent circus is out of the question’.
Back to the drawing board, wait until the next elections or find another site I guess.

Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 11:08 pm
by bazza
Jeffles wrote:
Simmo79 wrote:The local council has refused Tottenham Hotspur permission to build a new ground on Northumberland Park . A council official says, ‘A fun fair once a year is one thing but a permanent circus is out of the question’.
Back to the drawing board, wait until the next elections or find another site I guess.
I think it might have been an attempt at some kind of a joke

Meanwhile, the club have realeased Images of the proposed New Stadium

Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 7:14 am
by swede
A good stadium with the right capacity. They can fill it for all games.

THe whole project is great. I like stadiums in built-up areas with facilities that serve a purpose every day and where match days are then special occasions carefully planned to manage the crowds.

Its a balance between the traditional too-confined stadiums many of which have been abandoned in England and the sad ugly out-by-the motor way stadiums like Bolton or Reading

Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:10 am
by gyfox
The latest plans go on exhibition today.

[url]http://www.tottenhamhotspur.com/futurep ... oject.html

Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 9:33 pm
by Goonerblue
Egan, have you ever tried to get to WHL by public transport? Worst in London - so it'll need huge improvements.

Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 11:59 pm
by beastjim
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/footbal ... 326735.stm

Tottenham Hotspur have submitted a planning application for their new 56,000-seat stadium and hope to be playing at the venue by 2012.

Image

Re: Tottenham Hotspur outline scheme

Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 4:58 am
by kilonewton
Not everyone happy with the scheme.
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard- ... stadium.do

Re: Tottenham Hotspur outline scheme

Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 11:12 am
by Jeffles
I also saw a blog a few weeks back about the plans involving the demoliton of a building that formerly housed the club offices, even though it's not a necessary part of the redevelopment.

http://savetheredhouse.synthasite.com/