In anticipation (and also after) the match of the round between the Dockers and the Saints, who do you think is the better team out of these two young up-and-comings (or already-heres)? Which team will have more success and longevity?

Saints

They are the best bunch of really young players since the bombers of 1993. So that means a premiership now when they're young, and maybe in a few years time when theyve all matured a bit more

I dont think anyone can be entirely accuarate as I know in Western Australia, ST Kilda arent seen often on free to air.

Players of the ilk of Buckley, Crawford but have very low reputations compared to those players such as Bell, Hasleby and Pavlich three outstanding youngsters. Then Medhurst in the forward line who has only played 50 games and been their for 3 seasons. The sensational centre half back in McPharlin, anyone seeing him play will note how good he is playing. Farmer is on fire, etc I would seriously think Dockers ahead of Saints, because I don't believe they have the midfield or the defensive capabilities of the Dockers.

Although I could be completely wrong, DAMN CHANNEL 9,10 and FOXTEL

Well at last check the siants were winning by 7 goals

Saints premiers 2004? yes?

No, the crows have it in the bag this year. We'll be 6-5 and face our first test against West Coast at Subiaco. St Kilda will set the comp on fire during the home and away season, but we'll waltz on up and belt them from nowhere in the grand final like last time.

Hehe Yob - -- you wish!
The crows need to revamp their list----too many old players who are prone to injury. The team needs to be a whole deal younger and be moulded around Stenglein, Burton, Massie etc as leaders.

BUMP

I guess I will eventually win this debate, going on current trends

I guess Neil Craig made a fool of me

We now know why Adelaide lost its home final to St Kilda...