Australia

Austadiums :: The home of Australian Stadiums & Sport  |  Set as homepage  |

Austadiums Mobile

Austadiums Mobile

 
 
Australian Stadiums

 

HOME

STADIUMS

NEWS

SPORT

CROWDS

LIVE

FORUM

LINKS

myAUSTADIUMS

MY ACCOUNT
It is currently Thu Jun 20, 2013 1:58 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: World may not see Aussie cricket
PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 10:46 am 
Offline
Silver
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:07 pm
Posts: 545
Location: Brisbane
Quote:
World may not see Aussie cricket

NEWS agencies may be forced to cancel coverage of the first Australia-Sri Lanka cricket Test after organisers imposed unprecedented media restrictions.

They said Cricket Australia's (CA) demand that they surrender all intellectual property rights to their photo coverage of the game raised grave concerns about press freedom, leaving them unable to report on the Test.

The row means the main agencies - Agence France-Presse, Reuters and Associated Press - cannot cover the Test beginning in Brisbane Thursday, restricting the ability of cricket fans around the world to follow the match.

The agencies are part of a coalition of more than 30 media organisations - including Getty Images, News Limited (parent company of the publisher of News.com.au), Fairfax and Australian Associated Press - set up to oppose CA's stance.

CA insists it holds the intellectual property rights to agency photographs taken at its venues, and that those photos cannot be re-sold without its permission.

In still-continuing negotiations with CA, the agencies have refused to hand over rights to the photos, saying it would set a dangerous precedent. They say they will not be able to cover the Test series unless the issue is resolved.

The agencies have rejected a compromise offer from CA under which they would pay a licensing fee for the sale of photographs, saying that would run counter to the fundamental principles of news coverage.

"AFP will not pay to report news,'' AFP chairman Pierre Louette said.

"The accreditation terms imposed by CA are making it impossible for news agencies to achieve the impartial and independent coverage that is our mission.

"We are alarmed that, in the name of maximising the commercial exploitation of international sporting events, Cricket Australia is violating fundamental principles such as the freedom of the press and turning its back on the news agencies - which give life to cricket in all its different manifestations all over the world, and have done so for decades.''

Cricket Australia said it was acting to protect the media rights that form its core revenue in a changing media landscape.

"Where cricket generates commercial value, we believe that some of it should be available for investment in the future of cricket,'' CA spokesman Peter Young said.

There have been a series of recent clashes between sporting bodies and media organisations, as sports administrators seek to maximise revenues from news content on platforms such as the internet and mobile phones.

Media staged a boycott of the Rugby World Cup in France earlier this year after the International Rugby Board placed severe limits on the number of photographs that could be transmitted on the internet.

The restriction was lifted only 90 minutes before the tournament kicked off.

Mr Young said he hoped world media would still cover the Test and described the latest dispute as "tactical discussions''.

"The broader global debate is probably not going to be resolved for several years, as all parties increasingly understand what this means for us in the new media world,'' he said.


http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/stor ... 89,00.html

Not being an expert in this field Im a little confused of how this normally works. I can understand broadcasters etc buying the tv rights for a particular event/sport/world cup but do news agencies normally have to purchase rights? I would think not because they are reporting news and not providing entertainment.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 6:39 pm 
Offline
Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2002 1:14 am
Posts: 16831
Location: Mandurah
A cricketing board is using the fact it has licensing rights to exert its influence over news agencies. It is much like the Gabba contract, with the advertising that was in competition to the ACB's. And ACB having a hissy fit.

Cricket's argument is that we are the ones who provide the product and that everything that is incorporated in that product is ours and we will not allow people to use the rights that is our product that we are delivering to the news agencies.

However it is not like the ACB needs more money...

_________________
http://www.facebook.com/pages/EST-1996-New-Football-begins/305721319556718


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 10 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
 

AUSTRALIAN STADIUMS & SPORT    www.austadiums.com

AUS  STADIUMS
 • View Stadiums

 • Redevelopments
 • Former/Proposed Stadiums
 • Seating Maps
 • Highest Rated
 • Live Webcams
 • Stadium News
AUS  SPORT
 • Austadiums Sport Home
 • Events
 • Results
 • Crowds
 • Sports News
 • Sports Betting

 • Fox Sports
COMMUNITY
 • myAustadiums (Membership)
 • Forums
 • Links
 • Polls
 • Facebook
 • Google+
 • Twitter: @austadiums @au_sport
WEBSITE
 • About Austadiums
 • Mobile Site
 • Site Map
 • Terms & Conditions
 • Privacy Policy
 • Contribute
 • Contact Us
 © Copyright 1999-2013 Austadiums - All rights reserved.          www.austadiums.com CV web&graphic design