Page 12 of 42

Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:39 pm
by Egan
Nines, go back in your hole.

43,000 at Telstra for the game against France was pretty dissapointing. I would have expected Suncorp to have got 50,000+

Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 8:24 pm
by gyfox
Egan wrote:Nines, go back in your hole.

43,000 at Telstra for the game against France was pretty dissapointing. I would have expected Suncorp to have got 50,000+
They got 40,000 at Suncorp for the Wallabies v France game in July 2008.

Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 8:25 pm
by Egan
Is that better or worse than Sydney's effort considering that Sydney has 5 times as many people :lol:

Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:01 pm
by gyfox
Egan wrote:Is that better or worse than Sydney's effort considering that Sydney has 5 times as many people :lol:
Slightly over twice. :)

Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:15 pm
by beastjim
There was also a Kiwis test only a fortnight later in Brisbane last year. So you can assume the All Blacks would have detracted from the Frogs crowd. Similar situation in Sydney although it will be over a month between the games, enough to recharge the bank accounts.

Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:34 pm
by gyfox
beastjim wrote:There was also a Kiwis test only a fortnight later in Brisbane last year. So you can assume the All Blacks would have detracted from the Frogs crowd. Similar situation in Sydney although it will be over a month between the games, enough to recharge the bank accounts.
It will be interesting to look at total crowds this year to see if there is any reaction to the 36% reduction in per capita wealth over the last 12 months.

Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 10:07 pm
by gyfox
For whoever it was that sarcastically asked what the apparent temperature was at the Wallabies v France game in Canberra: -9

Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 10:25 pm
by Egan
gyfox wrote:
beastjim wrote:There was also a Kiwis test only a fortnight later in Brisbane last year. So you can assume the All Blacks would have detracted from the Frogs crowd. Similar situation in Sydney although it will be over a month between the games, enough to recharge the bank accounts.
It will be interesting to look at total crowds this year to see if there is any reaction to the 36% reduction in per capita wealth over the last 12 months.
Sydney still managed many sh*t crowds during the good times.

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 12:56 pm
by Nines
Egan wrote:Is that better or worse than Sydney's effort considering that Sydney has 5 times as many people :lol:
Do you say that because you are poor at maths or poor at geography or both ?

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 1:01 pm
by Egan
:lol:

I am someone who is more interested in facts than numbers Nines.

Just an oversight. But glad you get your kicks over this. How's Gooch going? Doing a great job at the Dockers is he?

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 3:36 pm
by Nines
Egan wrote: I am someone who is more interested in facts than numbers Nines.
So you don't believe numbers can be used as facts ?

. :oops:

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 6:21 pm
by Egan
How's Gooch going?

It was an oversight late at night. At least I answer your questions, you refuse to answer my questions on Gooch and the Dockers :lol:

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 6:48 pm
by Nines
Egan wrote:How's Gooch going?

It was an oversight late at night. At least I answer your questions, you refuse to answer my questions on Gooch and the Dockers :lol:

Little boy if you turn your attention to the top of your screen you wil see the letters "RU" . That means the grown ups here want to talk about Rugby Union .

:(

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 6:52 pm
by Egan
:lol: :lol:

Like you ever pay attention to that when I post in threads.

Hypocrite :lol:

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 6:56 pm
by Nines
Hey little boy...... bedtime .

.